flowcytometry
in Search
Welcome to Advenet Sign in | Join | Help

flowcytometry

flowjo Advertising

  

RE: making figures from facs histograms - did I miss something

From: J.Paul Robinson (jpr@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu)
Date: Tue Jan 09 2001 - 23:56:36 EST


OK I give in....where are you Mario....surely the MAC software is

the publishers dream....it can't be as horrific as all these messages

suggest....(although I did note its really interesting changing the

axis label in cellquest...) did I miss something ...

Paul

 

 

:              Calman Prussin <CPRUSSIN@niaid.nih.gov>

To: cyto-inbox

Subject:               RE: making figures from facs histograms

Date sent:             Tue, 9 Jan 2001 03:51:28 -0500

 

 

It amazes me that 5-6 years after the development of CellQuest, BD has never

published a primer on "Publishing with CellQuest". Several years ago I asked

a BD researcher a similar question of how they make their beautiful slides

and got a "minimalist" answer. I would like to see a BD representative

address this question or better yet...publish a primer.

 

It is too late a night (or I am too lazy) to put my own Cellquest to Canvas

methods to keyboard. But my general thoughts are that screen dumps are not

the way to go.

 

I use Canvas because I am fluent in its' use, not because I think it the

best program. If I had to learn it fresh, I might consider Adobe

Illustrator. What I would like to see in any publishing/graphic procedure:

1. Excellent resolution

2. Ability to rename axes, add arrows, labels

3. Ability to change the color of the dot plot.

 

Number 3 is very important to me for slide making, as rare events are

difficult to see with black on a  white background. I use yellow on a dark

blue background. I did not see mention of that capacity in any of previous

emails (can they do it?). Canvas gives you all of those.

 

Calman

> ----------

> From:        Idit Hazan

> Sent:        Wednesday, January 3, 2001 5:37 PM

> To:   Cytometry Mailing List

> Subject:     making figures from facs histograms

> 

> 

> hi

> does anyone know how to convert the histograms that come off the

> Cell-Quest

> program into something that can be copied and pasted into a graphic

> software (such as adobe or canvas), in order to make complicated figures?

> i was told cell-quest in not very user friendly and that people print

> their

> histograms, then scan them and use the scans as graphic files. there has

> to

> be a more elegant way...

> Idit Hazan

> University of California, Irvine

> 

> 

J.Paul Robinson, PhD           PH:(765)4940757

Professor of Immunopharmacology

Professor of Biomedical Engineering

Purdue University         FAX:(765)4940517

EMAIL:jpr@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu

WEB: http://www.cyto.purdue.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:03 EST

 

RE: making figures from facs histograms - did I miss something

From: Mario Roederer (Roederer@drmr.com)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 15:36:20 EST


At 11:56 PM -0500 1/9/01, J.Paul Robinson wrote:

>OK I give in....where are you Mario....surely the MAC software is

>the publishers dream....it can't be as horrific as all these messages

>suggest....(although I did note its really interesting changing the

>axis label in cellquest...) did I miss something ...

 

Paul (etc.):

 

Unfortunately, CellQuest was never written with the generation of

publication quality figures in mind.  Hence, all of its displays (as

far as I can tell) are "bitmap" representations, with no vector/font

information.  Hence, it is difficult to change things like colors,

fonts, etc.--you must use a program that can do bitmap editting and

then overlay with your own text/line information.  (Witness the

contortions people have to go through to make publication-quality

graphics!)

 

Paul was baiting my response about FlowJo and Macintoshes, so here

goes.  FlowJo was indeed designed to do publication quality output

(although not necessarily directly from the program, albeit it is

possible).  Not only do you have great control over the images (font

usage, font styling, overlay colors, addition of graphical elements,

text elements, annotations, etc.), but all images can be exported in

either JPEG, GIF, TIFF, or PICT format.  The first three formats,

while useful for sending to PC's and publishing on the web, are

essentially bitmap representations (although high-resolution,

publication-quality).  However, the PICT format, which is the

Macintosh standard for graphics, gives you complete control.  When

you copy from FlowJo and paste into any graphics application, you can

then ungroup the elements, select individual lines (or contours, dots

in dot plots, etc.), text items, or whatever, and manipulate them at

will.

 

For some examples, see

<http://www.treestar.com/flowjo/v3/html/pubgallery.html>.  For other

examples, see any of my publications... in particular, I'd like to

take this opportunity to advertise the upcoming February issue of

Nature Medicine, in which we have a New Technology article about

11-color flow cytometry!

 

The nice thing about Macintoshes is (as Paul notes) their power in

publication.  You can easily copy and paste between nearly any

applications, and, if they follow the PICT format, in a way that

preserves grouping of objects, fonts, vectors, fill patterns, bitmap

images, etc. etc.  By the way, I second the suggestion previously

made on this list regarding "GraphicConverter".  This is an

oustanding program that you can use to interconvert between nearly

any graphics formats.  It is shareware, written by Thorsten Lemke in

Germany.  See <http://www.lemkesoft.com/> for information.

 

mr



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:03 EST

FW: FlowJo Seminar for Los Angeles Basin

From: Barsky, Lora (LBarsky@chla.usc.edu)
Date: Tue Mar 20 2001 - 14:28:04 EST


		I'm not sure if there is a Los Angeles Basin users group,
but thought I could advertise here to interested parties.
		Thanks,

		Lora Barsky - Lead Operator
		Research Immunology/BMT FACS Core
		Childrens Hospital Los Angeles

>	__________________________________________________________________
>
>
>	FLOWJO TUTORIAL SEMINAR
>	Presented by Jennifer Wilshire, Ph.D.
>	Friday, March 30th
>	11 A.M.- Noon
>	Room 200, Smith Research Tower
>	Children's Hospital
>	__________________________________________________________________
>
>
>	11 A.M.- Noon - Demonstration, Q+A, and discussion of
>
>	1 - 5 P.M.- Personalized consulting (GoFlowJo@yahoo.com for an
> appointment)
>
>
> *
>
>
> On Friday, March 30th, Tree Star, Inc. will offer on-site training
> sessions on using FlowJo for the analysis of flow cytometric data.  FlowJo
> is advanced offline data analysis software, originally designed at the
> Stanford Shared FACS Facility, and now commercialized and in use by
> leading research sites worldwide.
>
>
> Built into the program is a wide array of visualizations and gating tools,
> as well as special platforms for Calcium Flux analysis, Cell Cycle
> analysis, Proliferation analysis, Population Comparison, Quantitation, and
> Compensation.  FlowJo produces the best publication quality graphics
> available, and introduces new technologies for presenting and publishing
> flow data via the web.
>
>
> Please visit <http://www.flowjo.com> for more information or to download a
> free 60-day trial of FlowJo. << File: Flyer good-USC >>
>
>  <<Flyer_good.jpg>>




Flyer_good.jpg

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:14 EST

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

flowcytometry said:

Re: MAC 10 operating system

From: Adam Treister (adam@treestar.com)

Date: Sun Apr 01 2001 - 15:00:35 EST

• Next message: g.gwhite: "Re: Hematogones"

• Previous message: sterling stoudenmire: "Re: CellQuest and MS Office"

• Maybe in reply to: zucker.robert@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV: "MAC 10 operating system"

• Next in thread: Rick Arthur Bright: "CD4 vs. CD8 Ratio BALB/c Mice"

• Reply: Rick Arthur Bright: "CD4 vs. CD8 Ratio BALB/c Mice"

• Reply: J.Paul Robinson: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

----->>> On 30-Mar-2001, Ulrik Sproge-Jakobsen wrote:

>   Thus, for those of us in the flow business using Mac

>   computers, we cetainly have to hope  that the software

>   developers in BD and Treestar release MacOS X-compatible or

>   at least carbonized versions of their flow software within

>   the foreseeable future (i.e. months - 1 year).

--------------

Tidbits has an article describing who should switch to OS X:

http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/TidBITS-573.html#lnk3

My take on the whole thing is that a summer release of X.1 is where we'll

see the marketing push, with native (carbonized) applications available.

I had planned to release at least a preliminary version of FlowJo for Mac

OS X on the same date that the operating system shipped, but wasn't able to

pull it off.  I'm currently in a holding pattern waiting for Apple to

provide tech support on a couple of questions, and for the makers of the

tools I use to build FlowJo to release OS X compatible versions of their

tools.  I just received a beta version of the code used to support USB

dongles, and that is expected to be finalized in about a month, but there

are a few other pieces of other peoples code that I need before I can

release a fully functional version for you all.  For the time being, I

still have to develop programs on OS 9, and then test them on OS X, getting

very little information about why the code doesn't work.

As Ulrik explained, any Mac application that runs under OS 9.1 will run

under OS X.  I know of people who have been using FlowJo with the beta

versions of OS X for months, so there is no problem there.  But there are

limitations in performance and all of the FlowJo windows are contained in

one "classic" window, which is  cumbersome.  So I've been anxious to put

out a "carbonized" version, which will work on OS8, 9 and 10.  But the

operating system has been changing so much in the past six months that I

have been waiting for the changes to settle.

Apple sent me a version called "Release Candidate" about two weeks before

the March 24 release date, so I decided it was time to install it and start

working on what they call a "carbonized" version of FlowJo.   The changes

in my code only took about a week, and runs fine under OS9, but dies right

away under OSX.  (Apple has a smug new dialog box, that says the

application has died, but it has not affected other applications or the

operating system).

Unfortunately, when I went to install the development tools so that I could

debug these problems, I found that my tools don't run under OS X.  The

installer program wouldn't read the CD that works fine on my older machine,

so I had to run it across the network.  That appeared to work, but somehow

left it in a state that kills the Finder when it tries to launch the tools.

So my experience has been that its not ready for prime time.   I'd

recommend that those who try it out do so on an extra computer, not only

because its still unproven, but you also have to erase the entire hard disk

in the installation process.

Apple's big developers' conference is in late May which is presumably where

they'll teach us programmers how to make it work, and fire us up with rabid

evangelism and Jolt cola. The big products like Filemaker and Microsoft

Office are claiming to release carbonized versions in summer/fall.  That's

when Apple will start shipping OS X preinstalled on the hardware.  So I

wouldn't recommend rushing into this now, unless you like to be on the

bleeding edge, but figure that by July new computers will come with it

installed, so thats a good time to move other machines as well.

All that said, it does look like OS X going to be quite nice.  It handles

multiple programs very smoothly,  is going to scale up nicely as they start

adding more processors to the boxes, and stabilizes the memory management

that has been what makes it so hard to write reliable Mac software.  There

are some nice improvements to the Finder (look for FlowJo to bring the NeXT

multi-column file browser to look at cell populations)  and I'm excited

about having real Unix, OpenGL and Java environments to leverage off of.

So I'll commit to saying that FlowJo will run native on OS X sometime soon,

and those who want to test out the early versions should contact me.  But I

wouldn't recommend converting earlier than this summer, other than as a

learning experience.

Adam

------------------------------------------------------------

Adam Treister   Tree Star, Inc.

ph: 1-800-366-6045  fax: 1-650-508-9186

adam@treestar.com   <http://www.treestar.com>

------------------------------------------------------------

________________________________________

• Next message: g.gwhite: "Re: Hematogones"

• Previous message: sterling stoudenmire: "Re: CellQuest and MS Office"

• Maybe in reply to: zucker.robert@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV: "MAC 10 operating system"

• Next in thread: Rick Arthur Bright: "CD4 vs. CD8 Ratio BALB/c Mice"

• Reply: Rick Arthur Bright: "CD4 vs. CD8 Ratio BALB/c Mice"

• Reply: J.Paul Robinson: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:16 EST

Re: MAC 10 operating system

From: J.Paul Robinson (jpr@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu)

Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 00:01:26 EST

• Next message: David Coder: "Re: Mean ratios - Log to Linear"

• Previous message: Kerstin B�ttner: "Viability PI vs. AAD - concentration and compensation"

• In reply to: Adam Treister: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Adam, Adam, Adam.....

If the new mac system is that bad, just change Flowjo to

Windows....at least it's predictably bad!

Paul

Date sent: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 13:00:35 -0700

From: Adam Treister <adam@treestar.com>

Subject: Re: MAC 10 operating system

To: cyto-inbox

>

> ----->>> On 30-Mar-2001, Ulrik Sproge-Jakobsen wrote:

> >   Thus, for those of us in the flow business using Mac

> >   computers, we cetainly have to hope  that the software

> >   developers in BD and Treestar release MacOS X-compatible or

> >   at least carbonized versions of their flow software within

> >   the foreseeable future (i.e. months - 1 year).

> --------------

> Tidbits has an article describing who should switch to OS X:

> http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/TidBITS-573.html#lnk3

>

> My take on the whole thing is that a summer release of X.1 is where

> we'll see the marketing push, with native (carbonized) applications

> available.

>

> I had planned to release at least a preliminary version of FlowJo for

> Mac OS X on the same date that the operating system shipped, but

> wasn't able to pull it off.  I'm currently in a holding pattern

> waiting for Apple to provide tech support on a couple of questions,

> and for the makers of the tools I use to build FlowJo to release OS X

> compatible versions of their tools.  I just received a beta version of

> the code used to support USB dongles, and that is expected to be

> finalized in about a month, but there are a few other pieces of other

> peoples code that I need before I can release a fully functional

> version for you all. For the time being, I still have to develop

> programs on OS 9, and then test them on OS X, getting very little

> information about why the code doesn't work.

>

> As Ulrik explained, any Mac application that runs under OS 9.1 will

> run under OS X.  I know of people who have been using FlowJo with the

> beta versions of OS X for months, so there is no problem there.  But

> there are limitations in performance and all of the FlowJo windows are

> contained in one "classic" window, which is  cumbersome.  So I've been

> anxious to put out a "carbonized" version, which will work on OS8, 9

> and 10.  But the operating system has been changing so much in the

> past six months that I have been waiting for the changes to settle.

>

> Apple sent me a version called "Release Candidate" about two weeks

> before the March 24 release date, so I decided it was time to install

> it and start working on what they call a "carbonized" version of

> FlowJo.   The changes in my code only took about a week, and runs fine

> under OS9, but dies right away under OSX.  (Apple has a smug new

> dialog box, that says the application has died, but it has not

> affected other applications or the operating system).

>

> Unfortunately, when I went to install the development tools so that I

> could debug these problems, I found that my tools don't run under OS

> X.  The installer program wouldn't read the CD that works fine on my

> older machine, so I had to run it across the network.  That appeared

> to work, but somehow left it in a state that kills the Finder when it

> tries to launch the tools. So my experience has been that its not

> ready for prime time.   I'd recommend that those who try it out do so

> on an extra computer, not only because its still unproven, but you

> also have to erase the entire hard disk in the installation process.

>

> Apple's big developers' conference is in late May which is presumably

> where they'll teach us programmers how to make it work, and fire us up

> with rabid evangelism and Jolt cola. The big products like Filemaker

> and Microsoft Office are claiming to release carbonized versions in

> summer/fall. That's when Apple will start shipping OS X preinstalled

> on the hardware.  So I wouldn't recommend rushing into this now,

> unless you like to be on the bleeding edge, but figure that by July

> new computers will come with it installed, so thats a good time to

> move other machines as well.

>

> All that said, it does look like OS X going to be quite nice.  It

> handles multiple programs very smoothly,  is going to scale up nicely

> as they start adding more processors to the boxes, and stabilizes the

> memory management that has been what makes it so hard to write

> reliable Mac software.  There are some nice improvements to the Finder

> (look for FlowJo to bring the NeXT multi-column file browser to look

> at cell populations) and I'm excited about having real Unix, OpenGL

> and Java environments to leverage off of. So I'll commit to saying

> that FlowJo will run native on OS X sometime soon, and those who want

> to test out the early versions should contact me.  But I wouldn't

> recommend converting earlier than this summer, other than as a

> learning experience.

>

> Adam

> ------------------------------------------------------------

> Adam Treister    Tree Star, Inc.

> ph: 1-800-366-6045  fax: 1-650-508-9186

> adam@treestar.com   <http://www.treestar.com>

> ------------------------------------------------------------

>

J.Paul Robinson, PhD PH:(765)4940757

Professor of Immunopharmacology

Professor of Biomedical Engineering

Purdue University   FAX:(765)4940517

EMAIL:jpr@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu

WEB: http://www.cyto.purdue.edu

________________________________________

• Next message: David Coder: "Re: Mean ratios - Log to Linear"

• Previous message: Kerstin B�ttner: "Viability PI vs. AAD - concentration and compensation"

• In reply to: Adam Treister: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:16 EST

CellQuest needs Mac OSX like a fish needs a bicycle

From: Calman Prussin (CPRUSSIN@niaid.nih.gov)

Date: Mon Apr 02 2001 - 20:12:10 EST

• Next message: Julie Auger: "April 20 workshop in DC"

• Previous message: cabrera.ej@pg.com: "Canine ELISAs"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

I believe Gloria Steinem said it best: "CellQuest needs Mac OSX like a fish

needs a bicycle".

If after reading the listserve over the past few years and seeing that every

new update of the "classic" MacOS somehow screws up CellQuest, do you

honestly think there is a snowballs' chance in hell that OS10.0 is really

going to run the current version of CellQuest???  Get real...

Surfs up, gotta' go

> > From: zucker.robert@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV

> > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:56:04 -0500

> > To: Cytometry Mailing List <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>

> > Subject: MAC 10 operating system

> >

> >

> > BD adn MAC users--here is a question?

> >

> > A few scientists who love Mac computers have talked about  the virtues

> of

> > the new MAC operating system 10. They say it is great and it is

> compatible

> > with older Mac operating systems. It even runs Cricket Graph which is 10

> > years old and was susosedly a favorite with the Mac lovers. Has anyone

> > tried to run the BD Cell Quest software with this new operating

> system.Does

> > It work???

> > It would be useful to know prior to installing this great operating

> system

> > on our MAC computers. Thanks

> > Bob

> >

> > Robert M. Zucker, PhD

> > U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

> > MD 72

> > National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory

> > Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711

> > Tel: 919-541-1585; fax 919-541-4017

> > e-mail: zucker.robert@epa.gov

> >

________________________________________

• Next message: Julie Auger: "April 20 workshop in DC"

• Previous message: cabrera.ej@pg.com: "Canine ELISAs"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:16 EST

CellQuest and OS 9.1

From: David_Matsuyama@BDIS.Com

Date: Mon Jun 04 2001 - 10:32:02 EST

• Next message: Beverly E. Barton: "OT: current e-mail address for R. Nunez?"

• Previous message: Haywood Pyle: "NY-ESO"

• Next in thread: duperray@montp.inserm.fr: "Re: CellQuest and OS 9.1"

• Reply: duperray@montp.inserm.fr: "Re: CellQuest and OS 9.1"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

I would like to respond to recent messages posted on the incompatibility of

Apple OS 9.1 and CellQuest Pro and CellQuest.  Apple

?s OS 9.1 requires new BD

inits (v3.4.1). The previous version of BD Inits (v 3.4) is compatible with

operating systems 9.0 and older. BD inits v3.4.1 is compatible with OS 9.0,

9.0.4 and 9.1.   Apple computers obtained outside of BD are not FACStations and

sometimes require customized configurations.  BD warrants all products purchased

from BD.  Inquires concerning obtaining the new BD inits should be directed to

your instrument sales representative.

David Matsuyama

BD Biosciences

Immunocytometry Systems

________________________________________

• Next message: Beverly E. Barton: "OT: current e-mail address for R. Nunez?"

• Previous message: Haywood Pyle: "NY-ESO"

• Next in thread: duperray@montp.inserm.fr: "Re: CellQuest and OS 9.1"

• Reply: duperray@montp.inserm.fr: "Re: CellQuest and OS 9.1"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:21 EST

FlowJo

From: Manfra, Denise (denise.manfra@spcorp.com)

Date: Tue Jun 19 2001 - 09:37:46 EST

• Next message: Arnold Richard Pizzey: "Re: absolute cell counts using FACS"

• Previous message: Sue DeMaggio: "Re: power meter"

• Next in thread: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe reply: CJett: "RE: FlowJo"

• Reply: Maciej Simm: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: janet dow: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe reply: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: FlowJo"

• Reply: Carmen Raventos-Suarez: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe reply: Phil Marder: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Hi:

I wanted some feedback on the FLOW Jo application. I

currently do all of my analysis with CellQuest. I am wondering if FLOW Jo

may expedite my analysis. However, I do not use the same markers all the

time, and in one experiment I may be running more than one stain with

multiple different antibodies. Basically, very seldom do I run the same set

of markers. How does FLOW Jo work for such conditions?? How about plot

analysis and excel: apparently Excell FLOW Jo puts the data directly into

EXcell?? What has been your experience with FLOW Jo?? Any information would

be useful.

denise

***************************************************************

This message and any attachments is solely for the intended recipient. If

you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use, or

distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited --

please immediately and permanently delete this message.

________________________________________

• Next message: Arnold Richard Pizzey: "Re: absolute cell counts using FACS"

• Previous message: Sue DeMaggio: "Re: power meter"

• Next in thread: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe reply: CJett: "RE: FlowJo"

• Reply: Maciej Simm: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: janet dow: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe reply: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: FlowJo"

• Reply: Carmen Raventos-Suarez: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe reply: Phil Marder: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: Adrian Smith (A.Smith@centenary.usyd.edu.AU)

Date: Wed Jun 20 2001 - 01:25:04 EST

• Next message: Esa-Matti Lilius: "review of a thesis"

• Previous message: Martha Moreno-Lafont: "IFN-g detection"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Giovanna Borsellino: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: Giovanna Borsellino: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

> Hi:

>

> I wanted some feedback on the FLOW Jo application. I

>currently do all of my analysis with CellQuest. I am wondering if FLOW Jo

>may expedite my analysis. However, I do not use the same markers all the

>time, and in one experiment I may be running more than one stain with

>multiple different antibodies. Basically, very seldom do I run the same set

>of markers. How does FLOW Jo work for such conditions?? How about plot

>analysis and excel: apparently Excell FLOW Jo puts the data directly into

>EXcell?? What has been your experience with FLOW Jo?? Any information would

>be useful.

>

> denise

I have been using FlowJo since it was released in 1997. I haven't

used CellQuest since I started using FlowJo.

I have analysed thousands of samples with a lot of different stain

combinations and FlowJo has worked very well for this. In FlowJo you

handle multiple stain combinations by grouping all the samples with

the same stain and then applying an analysis to all the samples (and

you can also make sample-specific adjustments very easily).

FlowJo can export statistics for each group and then you simply open

them in Excel. This features has saved me a LOT of time.

I would highly recommend FlowJo. I could go on about its benefits but

you can search the archives for my previous posts on FlowJo or read

the review I wrote at

<http://www.biocompare.com/prorev.asp?profrevid=49> for more of my

opinions. Better still, download the latest version and ask for a

free trial serial number. Make sure you do the tutorial and then test

it out on your own samples.

If you have any specific questions after you have tried it out feel

free to ask.

Adrian Smith

________________________________________

• Next message: Esa-Matti Lilius: "review of a thesis"

• Previous message: Martha Moreno-Lafont: "IFN-g detection"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Giovanna Borsellino: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: Giovanna Borsellino: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: Giovanna Borsellino (gborsel@tin.it)

Date: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 04:26:47 EST

• Next message: Howard Shapiro: "Re: Fluorescence polarization"

• Previous message: Mark Kukuruga: "Re: Do PI concentrations vary for measuring cell viability and DNA analysis???"

• In reply to: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Hi Denise,

        I very highly recommend FlowJo!  In our lab we perform

polychromatic flow cytometry routinely: our samples can be stained with up

to 9 different fluorochromes, and we have multiple samples with different

markers which have to be analyzed in each experiment. We have tried several

software packages, and when we found FlowJo we stopped searching. Actually,

now we use FlowJo even for samples stained with 'only'  3 colours, which we

acquire on the FACScan.

The way FlowJo works is slightly different from other flow-cytometry data

analysis software: basically in FlowJo you create "workspaces" where you

store all the information concerning your experiment: samples, gates,

annotations, statistics, compensation matrices, all your graphs, and

anything else you need for your data analysis. Once you set up the

workspace, data analysis is very fast. A workspace can actually be used as

a 'template'  for batch analysis of any subsequent experiment (this makes

life so much easier!!).

        The data with any statistic you can possibly wish for can be

transferred to Excel with a few clicks of the mouse: basically you choose

the statistics you're interested in, and FlowJo will create a spreadsheet

for you with all the calculated statistics from the samples you have

selected. The spreadsheet can then be easily exported to Excel or to

another application.

        If you are staining with multiple markers, FlowJo will perform

compensation correctly, no matter what the number of your fluorochromes is

(it is virtually impossible to set compensation correctly with the

'eye-meter'  when your samples have been stained for multiple markers).

        The one and only  criticism is that you need a Mac to run it. But

after starting to use it we decided it was actually worth to buy a new Mac,

which is now devoted only to data analysis with FlowJo (so we don't have to

fight over the Mac connected to the FACS...).

        It doesn't take too long to learn - of course, you have to make a

time investment, but it will really pay off. The Help files are helpful

indeed - it took us a couple of days, and that was it. You can try it for a

couple of months by downloading the software and getting a free serial

number. Go for it.

        I will be glad to show you some of the data we have produced

(FlowJo even creates movies!!) if you are interested.

Good luck!

Giovanna

(a FlowJo enthusiast)

>>         Hi:

>>

>>                 I wanted some feedback on the FLOW Jo application. I

>>currently do all of my analysis with CellQuest. I am wondering if FLOW Jo

>>may expedite my analysis. However, I do not use the same markers all the

>>time, and in one experiment I may be running more than one stain with

>>multiple different antibodies. Basically, very seldom do I run the same set

>>of markers. How does FLOW Jo work for such conditions?? How about plot

>>analysis and excel: apparently Excell FLOW Jo puts the data directly into

>>EXcell?? What has been your experience with FLOW Jo?? Any information would

>>be useful.

>>

>>         denise

------------------------------------------------

Giovanna Borsellino, M.D., Ph.D.

Neuroimmunology

IRCCS Santa Lucia

Via Ardeatina 354

00179 Roma

Italy

Tel. ++39.06.51501521 (office)

       ++39.06.51501552 (lab)

Fax  ++39.06.51501553

e-mail: g.borsellino@hsantalucia.it

           gborsel@tin.it

________________________________________

• Next message: Howard Shapiro: "Re: Fluorescence polarization"

• Previous message: Mark Kukuruga: "Re: Do PI concentrations vary for measuring cell viability and DNA analysis???"

• In reply to: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: janet dow (jldow@unity.ncsu.edu)

Date: Wed Jun 20 2001 - 11:27:00 EST

• Next message: Richard Konz: "Boston Users Group for Cytometry Mailing List"

• Previous message: Simon Monard: "Re: power meter"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

I have recently started using flowjo and i love it.  You can go to their

web site, www.flowjo.com and you can get a free 60 day trial on the

software.  I totally recomment trying it.

Janet Dow

At 10:37 AM -0400 6/19/01, Manfra, Denise wrote:

> Hi:

>

> I wanted some feedback on the FLOW Jo application. I

>currently do all of my analysis with CellQuest. I am wondering if FLOW Jo

>may expedite my analysis. However, I do not use the same markers all the

>time, and in one experiment I may be running more than one stain with

>multiple different antibodies. Basically, very seldom do I run the same set

>of markers. How does FLOW Jo work for such conditions?? How about plot

>analysis and excel: apparently Excell FLOW Jo puts the data directly into

>EXcell?? What has been your experience with FLOW Jo?? Any information would

>be useful.

>

> denise

>

>***************************************************************

> This message and any attachments is solely for the intended recipient. If

>you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use, or

>distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited --

>please immediately and permanently delete this message.

Janet Dow

Research Technician and Manager

Flow Cytometry Facility

North Carolina State College of Veterinary Medicine

Room C-314

Raleigh, NC 27606

(919)513-6364

________________________________________

• Next message: Richard Konz: "Boston Users Group for Cytometry Mailing List"

• Previous message: Simon Monard: "Re: power meter"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: Maciej Simm (simmmmer@yahoo.com)

Date: Wed Jun 20 2001 - 17:01:17 EST

• Next message: Simon Monard: "Re: power meter"

• Previous message: Howard Shapiro: "Re: power meter"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: janet dow: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Denise,

Analysis in FlowJo  works faster than other programs with correct

setup and the right template.

Regardless of how many markers you use, FlowJo will automatically

detect your panel settings and you can isolate/sort FACS files based

on their staining protocol (or any keyword) for a separate analysis.

Once you analyse some files you can generate statistical tables which

can be copied to clipboard and/or opened in excel.

For example, if I have an analyzed set of 1,000 samples for oxidative

burst test and want to generate an excel spreadsheet of

name/date/geometric mean/%positive and CV, I would specify those

parameters in my table editor, and with 2 click of a mouse I'll be in

excel ready to print the results.

FlowJo is also a great database tool for FACS files - one application

of that is to find normal ranges of rarely used markers. add a years

worth of FCS filies (provided enough RAM), create a group based on

your marker, apply gates to all of them with one click, and .. voila.

Plots can also be copied/pasted (as well as exported)  into

Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Canvas etc.

Feel free to contact me if you have any other questions,

Maciej Simm

Tree Star, Inc.

__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail

http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

________________________________________

• Next message: Simon Monard: "Re: power meter"

• Previous message: Howard Shapiro: "Re: power meter"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: janet dow: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

RE: FlowJo

From: CJett (CJett@Compucyte.com)

Date: Wed Jun 20 2001 - 15:25:00 EST

• Next message: Leonid Volkov: "Re: Fluorescence polarization"

• Previous message: Sue DeMaggio: "Core organization and fees"

• Maybe in reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Maciej Simm: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Most hardely agree with Adrian Smith...Flow Jo is a time saver for SO many

parts of data analysis.  It does take some time to get used to if you've

been working in the Cellquest reality for long..but well worth it!  Just not

having to enter data by hand is reason enuff!  But I do suggest keeping CQ

around...graphically it is a lil simpler to cut and paste from

Cj Jett

Scientist: Biomedical Development

Compucyte Corp.

(617)-577-3811

12 Emily St.

Cambridge Ma 02139-4507

________________________________________

• Next message: Leonid Volkov: "Re: Fluorescence polarization"

• Previous message: Sue DeMaggio: "Core organization and fees"

• Maybe in reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Maciej Simm: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: Phil Marder (mr_redram@hotmail.com)

Date: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 14:39:16 EST

• Next message: Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.: "RE: Fluorescence polarization"

• Previous message: Carmen Raventos-Suarez: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe in reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

When is the PC version of FloJo coming?

Some of us are waiting for this to give it a try.

-Phil Marder

----Original Message Follows----

From: Maciej Simm <simmmmer@yahoo.com>

To: cyto-inbox

Subject: Re: FlowJo

Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:01:17 -0700 (PDT)

Denise,

Analysis in FlowJo  works faster than other programs with correct

setup and the right template.

Regardless of how many markers you use, FlowJo will automatically

detect your panel settings and you can isolate/sort FACS files based

on their staining protocol (or any keyword) for a separate analysis.

Once you analyse some files you can generate statistical tables which

can be copied to clipboard and/or opened in excel.

For example, if I have an analyzed set of 1,000 samples for oxidative

burst test and want to generate an excel spreadsheet of

name/date/geometric mean/%positive and CV, I would specify those

parameters in my table editor, and with 2 click of a mouse I'll be in

excel ready to print the results.

FlowJo is also a great database tool for FACS files - one application

of that is to find normal ranges of rarely used markers. add a years

worth of FCS filies (provided enough RAM), create a group based on

your marker, apply gates to all of them with one click, and .. voila.

Plots can also be copied/pasted (as well as exported)  into

Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Canvas etc.

Feel free to contact me if you have any other questions,

Maciej Simm

Tree Star, Inc.

__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail

http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

_________________________________________________________________

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

________________________________________

• Next message: Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.: "RE: Fluorescence polarization"

• Previous message: Carmen Raventos-Suarez: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe in reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: Adrian Smith (A.Smith@centenary.usyd.edu.AU)

Date: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 16:44:49 EST

• Next message: Larry Arnold: "Fwd: Re: power meter"

• Previous message: Thomas Ahern: "Epithelial Markers"

• In reply to: Giovanna Borsellino: "Re: FlowJo"

• Next in thread: CJett: "RE: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

At 10:26 AM +0100 21/6/2001, Giovanna Borsellino wrote:

>

>         The one and only  criticism is that you need a Mac to run it.

>

Some people would say that is a definite advantage :)

At 4:25 PM -0400 20/6/2001, CJett wrote:

>  But I do suggest keeping CQ

>around...graphically it is a lil simpler to cut and paste from

But plots looks SO much nicer when they come from FlowJo...

Adrian Smith

________________________________________

• Next message: Larry Arnold: "Fwd: Re: power meter"

• Previous message: Thomas Ahern: "Epithelial Markers"

• In reply to: Giovanna Borsellino: "Re: FlowJo"

• Next in thread: CJett: "RE: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: Carmen Raventos-Suarez (carmen.raventossuarez@bms.com)

Date: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 16:49:26 EST

• Next message: Phil Marder: "Re: FlowJo"

• Previous message: Emmanuel Gustin: "Re: power meter"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Phil Marder: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Denise and everybody else interested in Flow Jo:

I have been using Flow Jo for a year and my requirements are very much like

yours. I also do a lot of DNA analysis, apoptosis and proliferation assays.

We just use the Fl-1,  Fl-2,  etc. as defaults. That way we can run different

set of samples using several different markers with the same dye at a single

run. Later in the analysis we add to the plots the specific name of the

markers. It is fast and efficient, I definitely love it, my analysis time has

been cut down in an exponential way. You create a template and can drop buckets

of samples in it to be analyzed in no time. This includes time for you to view

every single plot in a movie sequence to be sure that all your gates are

correct. Still  if you have cells from different origins and need to correct

gates, this can be done for the individual samples that require correction

leaving the rest untouchable. And the results on excel are at your finger tips

customized by your needs in a couple of clicks. I will never forget all the

macros I needed to built to create individual excel tables from cell quest.

I fewer words, as I told BD who where the ones who introduce me to Flow Jo:

"Flow Jo is like to live in the future and there is no way you want to return

to the past".

Carmen

"Manfra, Denise" wrote:

>         Hi:

>

>                 I wanted some feedback on the FLOW Jo application. I

> currently do all of my analysis with CellQuest. I am wondering if FLOW Jo

> may expedite my analysis. However, I do not use the same markers all the

> time, and in one experiment I may be running more than one stain with

> multiple different antibodies. Basically, very seldom do I run the same set

> of markers. How does FLOW Jo work for such conditions?? How about plot

> analysis and excel: apparently Excell FLOW Jo puts the data directly into

> EXcell?? What has been your experience with FLOW Jo?? Any information would

> be useful.

>

>         denise

>

> ***************************************************************

>  This message and any attachments is solely for the intended recipient. If

> you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use, or

> distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited --

> please immediately and permanently delete this message.

________________________________________

• text/x-vcard attachment: Card for Carmen Raventos-Suarez

________________________________________

• Next message: Phil Marder: "Re: FlowJo"

• Previous message: Emmanuel Gustin: "Re: power meter"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Phil Marder: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

RE: FlowJo

From: Gerstein, Rachel (Rachel.Gerstein@umassmed.edu)

Date: Fri Jun 22 2001 - 09:39:24 EST

• Next message: Emmanuel Gustin: "Re: power meter"

• Previous message: Larry Arnold: "Fwd: Re: power meter"

• Maybe in reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Carmen Raventos-Suarez: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

I think FlowJo will still expedite your analysis, because its quick to call

up new 2-D plots and impose new gates.  And the quick dump into Excell, or

using FlowJo's own table generator will also save time.  I use FlowJo

exclusively and highly recommend it.  Its worth mentioning that its easy to

learn and I rountinely teach undergraduates to do their own analyses.

Good luck,

Rachel

=======================================================

Rachel M. Gerstein, Ph.D.

Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology

Graduate Program in Immunology/Virology

University of Massachusetts Medical School

55 Lake Avenue North

Worcester, MA 01655-0002

(508) 856-1044

(508) 856-5920 (FAX)

> ----------

> From: Manfra, Denise

> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:37 AM

> To: Cytometry Mailing List

> Subject: FlowJo

>

>

>

> Hi:

>

> I wanted some feedback on the FLOW Jo application. I

> currently do all of my analysis with CellQuest. I am wondering if FLOW Jo

> may expedite my analysis. However, I do not use the same markers all the

> time, and in one experiment I may be running more than one stain with

> multiple different antibodies. Basically, very seldom do I run the same

> set

> of markers. How does FLOW Jo work for such conditions?? How about plot

> analysis and excel: apparently Excell FLOW Jo puts the data directly into

> EXcell?? What has been your experience with FLOW Jo?? Any information

> would

> be useful.

>

> denise

>

> ***************************************************************

>  This message and any attachments is solely for the intended recipient. If

> you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use, or

> distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited --

> please immediately and permanently delete this message.

>

>

________________________________________

• Next message: Emmanuel Gustin: "Re: power meter"

• Previous message: Larry Arnold: "Fwd: Re: power meter"

• Maybe in reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Carmen Raventos-Suarez: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

[Fwd: [Fwd: Converting data from Mac]]

From: Ana Salas (ana@lupo.medicina.uniovi.es)

Date: Tue Jul 17 2001 - 07:31:49 EST

• Next message: Jeff Louie: "7 AAD"

• Previous message: Fjerdingstad, Hege: "RE: aVb3 and aVb5 monoclonal antibodies"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

attached mail follows:

________________________________________

Hola Ana.

Tal vez esto llegue un poco tarde pero el 13 ya estaba de vacances.

> Subject: Converting data from Mac

> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:10:00 +0200

> From: Ellen.Freed@astrazeneca.com

> To: Cytometry Mailing List <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>

>

> Hi All

>

> We're considering buying a FACScalibur from BD, but are concerned that BD is

> all in MAC format and all our computers are PC's .  I was told by someone at

> BD that this shouldn't be a problem, because everything could be easily

> converted if need be - but I've heard of others who've had problems with this.

>

> I have been working with a FACScalibur conected to a Mac. The data files

> generated by this system are compatible with other flowcytometer PC's

> software, including cell cycle analysis. There was no need for data

> conversion. The only difference is that data files generated by PC have an

> extension .fcs and the ones the generated under Mac have no extension or

> something like .001 that is not a real file extension. However, files

> generated under Mac with a file name as RQ.001 are directly read by Modfit

> under PC.

>

> We'll need to do cell cycle analysis using Modfit or Multicycle, which we'll

> probably want to have on a couple of remote computers which are PC's.  Any

> experience with this problem?

I have carried cell cycle analysis using Modfit both in Mac and PC's versions.

>

> Also, I know that CellQuest is also only in MAC format.  What does CellQuest

> offer that we couldn't do with the above-mentioned cell cycle programs?

>

Cell Quest is the software that adquires the data directely from the

flowcytometer and where you can adjust the receptor channels (intensity,

compensation, threshold), the data that you want to store in the data files, the

number of cells to analyse, etc.

Modfit carries out the model analysis to determine cell cycle populations from

the files generated by Cell Quest. I have not used Multicycle.

I have been working with a FACScalibur in Bergen (Norway) a few months ago. Data

files were generated by Cell Quest (under Mac). I sent several of those files to

the technician of the University of Oviedo (that works with PC) to carry out the

cell cycle analysis and she couldn�t read them. In the begining, we thought that

it was a matter of Mac-PC compatibility, but turned out to be a problem of data

transference through email, that for some reason the files were somehow altered.

All the data files generated by the FACScalibur that I worked with in Bergen

(conected to a Mac) are read for cell cycle analysis by Modfit under a PC.

>

> Thanks to anyone who can help.

>

> Ellen Freed

> Scientist

> Cancer Bioscience

> AstraZeneca R & D Boston

--

Rafael Gonz�lez-Quir�s

Universidad de Oviedo

Dpt. B.O.S. (�rea Ecolog�a)

c/ Catedr�tico Rodrigo Ur�a s/n

Oviedo 33071

Spain

Tfn: +34-985104831

Fax: +34-985104866

________________________________________

• Next message: Jeff Louie: "7 AAD"

• Previous message: Fjerdingstad, Hege: "RE: aVb3 and aVb5 monoclonal antibodies"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:23 EST

FlowJo plus others

From: Andy Johnson (andy@brc.ubc.ca)

Date: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 13:51:26 EST

• Next message: emorgan@PharMingen.com: "INF-gamma detection"

• Previous message: Lily Lai: "Re: IFN-g detection"

• Next in thread: Bgreig2@AOL.com: "Re: FlowJo plus others"

• Maybe reply: Bgreig2@AOL.com: "Re: FlowJo plus others"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Just a quick point

It all seems to be happening again, with regards to alternative analysis

software.  Whilst everybody is raving about FlowJo you have to remember

that there are quite a number of analysis software packages available.

Although FlowJo is good, I choose to use FCSpress.

All the programs offer much the same features although the cost varies, so

again play around and choose the one that suits you.

Andy

FACS Facility Manager

Biomedical Research Centre

Vancouver

________________________________________

• Next message: emorgan@PharMingen.com: "INF-gamma detection"

• Previous message: Lily Lai: "Re: IFN-g detection"

• Next in thread: Bgreig2@AOL.com: "Re: FlowJo plus others"

• Maybe reply: Bgreig2@AOL.com: "Re: FlowJo plus others"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo plus others

From: Bgreig2@AOL.com

Date: Fri Jun 22 2001 - 11:57:31 EST

• Next message: Wilshire Jennifer: "FlowJo Seminars-NIH and Baltimore (6/25-6/28)"

• Previous message: Jan_F_Keij@sbphrd.com: "osmium tetroxide fixation"

• Maybe in reply to: Andy Johnson: "FlowJo plus others"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

I'd have to agree with Andy.  There are several good off-line programs out there.

Verity Software's WINLIST program has countless features that we find invaluable for list

mode analysis including batch analysis, auto-compensation, export/import functionality,

spreadsheet linking, database support...the list of features is extensive.  And,

it's very easy to learn.

 CellQuest is fine for lots of app's but flexability and learning seem to be easier

 with these alternative programs.  As mentioned in an earlier discussion, check around

 and try some demos before jumping in.

My two cents,

Bruce Greig

Immunopathology Lab

Vanderbilt Univ. Medical Center

Nashville, TN.

________________________________________

• Next message: Wilshire Jennifer: "FlowJo Seminars-NIH and Baltimore (6/25-6/28)"

• Previous message: Jan_F_Keij@sbphrd.com: "osmium tetroxide fixation"

• Maybe in reply to: Andy Johnson: "FlowJo plus others"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

December 24, 2008 3:14 PM
 

flowcytometry said:

Mean ratios; complete with a bottom line!

From: Mario Roederer (Roederer@drmr.com)

Date: Tue Mar 27 2001 - 15:36:54 EST

• Next message: JOHN MARIO GONZALEZ _ PROFESOR DPT. MICROBIOLOGIA-.: "Hematogones"

• Previous message: Howard Shapiro: "Re: Mean ratios; complete with a bottom line!"

• In reply to: Howard Shapiro: "Re: Ratio or Mean"

• Next in thread: Howard Shapiro: "Re: Mean ratios; complete with a bottom line!"

• Reply: Howard Shapiro: "Re: Mean ratios; complete with a bottom line!"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Howard:

You seemed a bit steamed in your EMail... so it is with trepidation

that I step into the foray.  Hopefully you won't be "mean" to me.

>...the software gives you the geometric

>mean because it is easy to compute, i.e., it doesn't require transformation

>of the data between log and linear space, while computing the real mean

>would.

Most software doesn't give you geometric mean because it's "easy", it

does so because it tends to be the most useful statistic.  The

transformation itself is trivial and does not impact on programming

demand, and it sure doesn't slow down today's computers noticeably.

Any software package capable of software compensation clearly has the

capability of computing arithmetic means...

>TAKING THE RATIO OF TWO QUANTITIES ON A LOG SCALE IS SO STUPID THAT ANYONE

>INCLUDING SUCH A CALCULATION IN A PAPER SUBMITTED TO A JOURNAL SHOULD BE

>BANNED FOR A YEAR FROM SUBMITTING ANOTHER PAPER - but, lucky for so many

>people, most of the reviewers and editors, even those associated with some

>really toney journals, are blissfully unaware just how stupid it is.

It is important to clarify that what is stupid is ratioing the

channel values of a log scale--i.e., ratioing values that increase

linearly on a logarithmic fluorescence scale.  There is nothing

inherently wrong with ratioing the "scale" values (those that

increase exponentially).  For example, if a population has a median

fluorescence of 10,000 (4th decade, channel 1024) and another has a

median fluorescence of 1,000 (3rd decade, channel 768), then it is

appropriate to note that it is 10 times as bright as the other (not

1.33 times).

We used ratios when it was appropriate: for example, when we were

measuring the fold-increase of beta-gal activity driven by a promoter

after stimulation (measured by FACS-Gal assay).  The pre-stimulation

condition still expressed considerable beta-gal; when stimulated, we

got 5x or 10x as much.  The ratio of the median fluorescences was

appropriate because we found that the RATIO of the post- to

pre-stimulation values was conserved across different cell lines,

although they had different basal expression levels (and therefore

different stimulated levels).  This was interesting

scientifically--says something about the log-responsiveness of

promoters and enhancers... but I digress.  Note that it is rarely

correct to ratio against the median or mean autofluorescence--rather,

as you point out, subtraction is superior for such a case.

>If you are actually trying to compare flow data with a bulk assay of some

>kind - for example, you have determined the total amount of fluorescent

>label in a solution of 100,000 cells, and you now want to calibrate the

>flow cytometric fluorescence histogram in terms of molecules of label per

>channel - you do need to use the arithmetic mean, as Alice Givan recently

>pointed out, and you therefore need linear data, while you usually have log

>data.

Actually, we found an very good correlation between the MEDIAN

fluorescence of a population of cultured cells expressing

b-galactosidase (measured by the FACS-Gal assay) and the total b-gal

content of the population by a biochemical assay (MUG).  Of course,

this was because the populations were relatively homogeneous

(clonal), with about 1-decade range in fluorescence--for

heterogeneous expressions, the median was not a very good correlate

of the biochemical activity.

This actually raises the most important point that everyone seems to

be dancing around but ignoring:  using any statistic is good as long

as you justify (to yourself, and to the reviewers) that it is

appropriate!  In other words, if your cell population is homogeneous,

then nearly anything will work.  If it's not homogeneous, then you

may have a lot of trouble with any single statistic.

While I agree that the arithmetic mean is probably going to be the

closest for heterogeneous populations, I disagree that it should be

used!  The fact that the population cannot be effectively described

by the median means that there is an interesting heterogeneity

underlying the expression--and therefore it becomes a mistake to

reduce the data to a single value.

After all, this is where the power of flow cytometry is:  in the

description of the DISTRIBUTION of expression.  The fact that people

continue to take pains to reduce our gloriously rich and detailed

data to a single number pains me to no end!  Much better would be to

calculate the 10th, 25th, 50th (median), 75th, and 90th percentiles

of a complex distribution:  at least now you have 5 parameters to the

distribution and therefore a much better chance of accurately

describing it (and possibly discovering underlying phenomena hidden

by using only a single value).

Here's my bottom line for log distributions:

"If the median is an inadequate description of the distribution, then

it is inappropriate to reduce the distribution to a single value by

any algorithm."

In such a case, using the arithmetic mean, geometric mean, Mario's

mean, Howard's mean, or even God's mean (should that actually differ

from Howard's) won't be any better and is only throwing mud onto a

beautiful painting of data.

mr

(PS: Mario's never mean.)

________________________________________

• Next message: JOHN MARIO GONZALEZ _ PROFESOR DPT. MICROBIOLOGIA-.: "Hematogones"

• Previous message: Howard Shapiro: "Re: Mean ratios; complete with a bottom line!"

• In reply to: Howard Shapiro: "Re: Ratio or Mean"

• Next in thread: Howard Shapiro: "Re: Mean ratios; complete with a bottom line!"

• Reply: Howard Shapiro: "Re: Mean ratios; complete with a bottom line!"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:15 EST

Re: MAC 10 operating system

From: Ulrik Sprogøe-Jakobsen (usj@dadlnet.dk)

Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 02:38:38 EST

• Next message: Joseph Webster: "Re: Rhodamine"

• Previous message: Michael Ormerod: "Book on Flow Cytometry"

• In reply to: zucker.robert@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV: "MAC 10 operating system"

• Next in thread: Adam Treister: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

MacOS X (ten) is a completely new OS for Macintosh computers. It is based on

BSD UNIX (Darwin), and as such it implements some of the features of a

modern OS not found in the present MacOS (e.g. protected memory, preemptive

multitasking and multiprocessor support).

In MacOS X, Macintosh compatible software may be run in 3 different

environments.

1) Cocoa - the MacOS X native environment. For an app. e.g. CELLQuest to run

in this environment, it has to be completely rewritten for MacOS X.

2) Classic - the MacOS X classic environment. The classic Mac applications,

e.g. Cricket Graph are run here. No rewrite necessary.

3) Carbon - the MacOS X/Classic 'intermediate' environment. Classic apps.

require a minor rewrite ('carbonization'), but will then take advantage of

some of MacOS X' prominent features (speed, stability etc.)

After installation of MacOS X, the user may opt to start up the Mac from a

classic OS (i.e. MacOS 9.1, which is included with the MacOS X installation

disc) instead of MacOS X. Thus, if a user encounters insurmountable problems

running an application in MacOS X, there will always be the possibility to

restart the Mac and run the app. in a true MacOS 9.1 environment.

Thus, for those of us in the flow business using Mac computers, we cetainly

have to hope  that the software developers in BD and Treestar release MacOS

X-compatible or at least carbonized versions of their flow software within

the foreseeable future (i.e. months - 1 year).

Hope this helps

Ulrik

--

Ulrik Sprogøe-Jakobsen, M.D., Ph.D.

Dept. Clinical Immunology

Odense University Hospital

DK-5000 Odense C

Denmark

E-mail: usj@dadlnet.dk

Fax:     +45 6612 7975

Phone: +45 6541 3674

> From: zucker.robert@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV

> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:56:04 -0500

> To: Cytometry Mailing List <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>

> Subject: MAC 10 operating system

>

>

> BD adn MAC users--here is a question?

>

> A few scientists who love Mac computers have talked about  the virtues of

> the new MAC operating system 10. They say it is great and it is compatible

> with older Mac operating systems. It even runs Cricket Graph which is 10

> years old and was susosedly a favorite with the Mac lovers. Has anyone

> tried to run the BD Cell Quest software with this new operating system.Does

> It work???

> It would be useful to know prior to installing this great operating system

> on our MAC computers. Thanks

> Bob

>

> Robert M. Zucker, PhD

> U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

> MD 72

> National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory

> Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711

> Tel: 919-541-1585; fax 919-541-4017

> e-mail: zucker.robert@epa.gov

>

>

________________________________________

• Next message: Joseph Webster: "Re: Rhodamine"

• Previous message: Michael Ormerod: "Book on Flow Cytometry"

• In reply to: zucker.robert@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV: "MAC 10 operating system"

• Next in thread: Adam Treister: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:16 EST

MAC 10 operating system

From: zucker.robert@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV

Date: Wed Mar 28 2001 - 15:56:04 EST

• Next message: Houston, Jim : "RE: Time delay before sorting"

• Previous message: Elena Soriano: "GFP in bacteria"

• Next in thread: Ulrik Sprog�e-Jakobsen: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Reply: Ulrik Sprog�e-Jakobsen: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Maybe reply: Adam Treister: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

BD adn MAC users--here is a question?

A few scientists who love Mac computers have talked about  the virtues of

the new MAC operating system 10. They say it is great and it is compatible

with older Mac operating systems. It even runs Cricket Graph which is 10

years old and was susosedly a favorite with the Mac lovers. Has anyone

tried to run the BD Cell Quest software with this new operating system.Does

It work???

It would be useful to know prior to installing this great operating system

on our MAC computers. Thanks

Bob

Robert M. Zucker, PhD

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

MD 72

National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711

Tel: 919-541-1585; fax 919-541-4017

e-mail: zucker.robert@epa.gov

________________________________________

• Next message: Houston, Jim : "RE: Time delay before sorting"

• Previous message: Elena Soriano: "GFP in bacteria"

• Next in thread: Ulrik Sprog�e-Jakobsen: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Reply: Ulrik Sprog�e-Jakobsen: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Maybe reply: Adam Treister: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:15 EST

Re: MAC 10 operating system

From: Adam Treister (adam@treestar.com)

Date: Sun Apr 01 2001 - 15:00:35 EST

• Next message: g.gwhite: "Re: Hematogones"

• Previous message: sterling stoudenmire: "Re: CellQuest and MS Office"

• Maybe in reply to: zucker.robert@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV: "MAC 10 operating system"

• Next in thread: Rick Arthur Bright: "CD4 vs. CD8 Ratio BALB/c Mice"

• Reply: Rick Arthur Bright: "CD4 vs. CD8 Ratio BALB/c Mice"

• Reply: J.Paul Robinson: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

----->>> On 30-Mar-2001, Ulrik Sproge-Jakobsen wrote:

>   Thus, for those of us in the flow business using Mac

>   computers, we cetainly have to hope  that the software

>   developers in BD and Treestar release MacOS X-compatible or

>   at least carbonized versions of their flow software within

>   the foreseeable future (i.e. months - 1 year).

--------------

Tidbits has an article describing who should switch to OS X:

http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/TidBITS-573.html#lnk3

My take on the whole thing is that a summer release of X.1 is where we'll

see the marketing push, with native (carbonized) applications available.

I had planned to release at least a preliminary version of FlowJo for Mac

OS X on the same date that the operating system shipped, but wasn't able to

pull it off.  I'm currently in a holding pattern waiting for Apple to

provide tech support on a couple of questions, and for the makers of the

tools I use to build FlowJo to release OS X compatible versions of their

tools.  I just received a beta version of the code used to support USB

dongles, and that is expected to be finalized in about a month, but there

are a few other pieces of other peoples code that I need before I can

release a fully functional version for you all.  For the time being, I

still have to develop programs on OS 9, and then test them on OS X, getting

very little information about why the code doesn't work.

As Ulrik explained, any Mac application that runs under OS 9.1 will run

under OS X.  I know of people who have been using FlowJo with the beta

versions of OS X for months, so there is no problem there.  But there are

limitations in performance and all of the FlowJo windows are contained in

one "classic" window, which is  cumbersome.  So I've been anxious to put

out a "carbonized" version, which will work on OS8, 9 and 10.  But the

operating system has been changing so much in the past six months that I

have been waiting for the changes to settle.

Apple sent me a version called "Release Candidate" about two weeks before

the March 24 release date, so I decided it was time to install it and start

working on what they call a "carbonized" version of FlowJo.   The changes

in my code only took about a week, and runs fine under OS9, but dies right

away under OSX.  (Apple has a smug new dialog box, that says the

application has died, but it has not affected other applications or the

operating system).

Unfortunately, when I went to install the development tools so that I could

debug these problems, I found that my tools don't run under OS X.  The

installer program wouldn't read the CD that works fine on my older machine,

so I had to run it across the network.  That appeared to work, but somehow

left it in a state that kills the Finder when it tries to launch the tools.

So my experience has been that its not ready for prime time.   I'd

recommend that those who try it out do so on an extra computer, not only

because its still unproven, but you also have to erase the entire hard disk

in the installation process.

Apple's big developers' conference is in late May which is presumably where

they'll teach us programmers how to make it work, and fire us up with rabid

evangelism and Jolt cola. The big products like Filemaker and Microsoft

Office are claiming to release carbonized versions in summer/fall.  That's

when Apple will start shipping OS X preinstalled on the hardware.  So I

wouldn't recommend rushing into this now, unless you like to be on the

bleeding edge, but figure that by July new computers will come with it

installed, so thats a good time to move other machines as well.

All that said, it does look like OS X going to be quite nice.  It handles

multiple programs very smoothly,  is going to scale up nicely as they start

adding more processors to the boxes, and stabilizes the memory management

that has been what makes it so hard to write reliable Mac software.  There

are some nice improvements to the Finder (look for FlowJo to bring the NeXT

multi-column file browser to look at cell populations)  and I'm excited

about having real Unix, OpenGL and Java environments to leverage off of.

So I'll commit to saying that FlowJo will run native on OS X sometime soon,

and those who want to test out the early versions should contact me.  But I

wouldn't recommend converting earlier than this summer, other than as a

learning experience.

Adam

------------------------------------------------------------

Adam Treister   Tree Star, Inc.

ph: 1-800-366-6045  fax: 1-650-508-9186

adam@treestar.com   <http://www.treestar.com>

------------------------------------------------------------

________________________________________

• Next message: g.gwhite: "Re: Hematogones"

• Previous message: sterling stoudenmire: "Re: CellQuest and MS Office"

• Maybe in reply to: zucker.robert@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV: "MAC 10 operating system"

• Next in thread: Rick Arthur Bright: "CD4 vs. CD8 Ratio BALB/c Mice"

• Reply: Rick Arthur Bright: "CD4 vs. CD8 Ratio BALB/c Mice"

• Reply: J.Paul Robinson: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:16 EST

Re: MAC 10 operating system

From: J.Paul Robinson (jpr@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu)

Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 00:01:26 EST

• Next message: David Coder: "Re: Mean ratios - Log to Linear"

• Previous message: Kerstin B�ttner: "Viability PI vs. AAD - concentration and compensation"

• In reply to: Adam Treister: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Adam, Adam, Adam.....

If the new mac system is that bad, just change Flowjo to

Windows....at least it's predictably bad!

Paul

Date sent: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 13:00:35 -0700

From: Adam Treister <adam@treestar.com>

Subject: Re: MAC 10 operating system

To: cyto-inbox

>

> ----->>> On 30-Mar-2001, Ulrik Sproge-Jakobsen wrote:

> >   Thus, for those of us in the flow business using Mac

> >   computers, we cetainly have to hope  that the software

> >   developers in BD and Treestar release MacOS X-compatible or

> >   at least carbonized versions of their flow software within

> >   the foreseeable future (i.e. months - 1 year).

> --------------

> Tidbits has an article describing who should switch to OS X:

> http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/TidBITS-573.html#lnk3

>

> My take on the whole thing is that a summer release of X.1 is where

> we'll see the marketing push, with native (carbonized) applications

> available.

>

> I had planned to release at least a preliminary version of FlowJo for

> Mac OS X on the same date that the operating system shipped, but

> wasn't able to pull it off.  I'm currently in a holding pattern

> waiting for Apple to provide tech support on a couple of questions,

> and for the makers of the tools I use to build FlowJo to release OS X

> compatible versions of their tools.  I just received a beta version of

> the code used to support USB dongles, and that is expected to be

> finalized in about a month, but there are a few other pieces of other

> peoples code that I need before I can release a fully functional

> version for you all. For the time being, I still have to develop

> programs on OS 9, and then test them on OS X, getting very little

> information about why the code doesn't work.

>

> As Ulrik explained, any Mac application that runs under OS 9.1 will

> run under OS X.  I know of people who have been using FlowJo with the

> beta versions of OS X for months, so there is no problem there.  But

> there are limitations in performance and all of the FlowJo windows are

> contained in one "classic" window, which is  cumbersome.  So I've been

> anxious to put out a "carbonized" version, which will work on OS8, 9

> and 10.  But the operating system has been changing so much in the

> past six months that I have been waiting for the changes to settle.

>

> Apple sent me a version called "Release Candidate" about two weeks

> before the March 24 release date, so I decided it was time to install

> it and start working on what they call a "carbonized" version of

> FlowJo.   The changes in my code only took about a week, and runs fine

> under OS9, but dies right away under OSX.  (Apple has a smug new

> dialog box, that says the application has died, but it has not

> affected other applications or the operating system).

>

> Unfortunately, when I went to install the development tools so that I

> could debug these problems, I found that my tools don't run under OS

> X.  The installer program wouldn't read the CD that works fine on my

> older machine, so I had to run it across the network.  That appeared

> to work, but somehow left it in a state that kills the Finder when it

> tries to launch the tools. So my experience has been that its not

> ready for prime time.   I'd recommend that those who try it out do so

> on an extra computer, not only because its still unproven, but you

> also have to erase the entire hard disk in the installation process.

>

> Apple's big developers' conference is in late May which is presumably

> where they'll teach us programmers how to make it work, and fire us up

> with rabid evangelism and Jolt cola. The big products like Filemaker

> and Microsoft Office are claiming to release carbonized versions in

> summer/fall. That's when Apple will start shipping OS X preinstalled

> on the hardware.  So I wouldn't recommend rushing into this now,

> unless you like to be on the bleeding edge, but figure that by July

> new computers will come with it installed, so thats a good time to

> move other machines as well.

>

> All that said, it does look like OS X going to be quite nice.  It

> handles multiple programs very smoothly,  is going to scale up nicely

> as they start adding more processors to the boxes, and stabilizes the

> memory management that has been what makes it so hard to write

> reliable Mac software.  There are some nice improvements to the Finder

> (look for FlowJo to bring the NeXT multi-column file browser to look

> at cell populations) and I'm excited about having real Unix, OpenGL

> and Java environments to leverage off of. So I'll commit to saying

> that FlowJo will run native on OS X sometime soon, and those who want

> to test out the early versions should contact me.  But I wouldn't

> recommend converting earlier than this summer, other than as a

> learning experience.

>

> Adam

> ------------------------------------------------------------

> Adam Treister    Tree Star, Inc.

> ph: 1-800-366-6045  fax: 1-650-508-9186

> adam@treestar.com   <http://www.treestar.com>

> ------------------------------------------------------------

>

J.Paul Robinson, PhD PH:(765)4940757

Professor of Immunopharmacology

Professor of Biomedical Engineering

Purdue University   FAX:(765)4940517

EMAIL:jpr@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu

WEB: http://www.cyto.purdue.edu

________________________________________

• Next message: David Coder: "Re: Mean ratios - Log to Linear"

• Previous message: Kerstin B�ttner: "Viability PI vs. AAD - concentration and compensation"

• In reply to: Adam Treister: "Re: MAC 10 operating system"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:16 EST

CellQuest needs Mac OSX like a fish needs a bicycle

From: Calman Prussin (CPRUSSIN@niaid.nih.gov)

Date: Mon Apr 02 2001 - 20:12:10 EST

• Next message: Julie Auger: "April 20 workshop in DC"

• Previous message: cabrera.ej@pg.com: "Canine ELISAs"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

I believe Gloria Steinem said it best: "CellQuest needs Mac OSX like a fish

needs a bicycle".

If after reading the listserve over the past few years and seeing that every

new update of the "classic" MacOS somehow screws up CellQuest, do you

honestly think there is a snowballs' chance in hell that OS10.0 is really

going to run the current version of CellQuest???  Get real...

Surfs up, gotta' go

> > From: zucker.robert@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV

> > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:56:04 -0500

> > To: Cytometry Mailing List <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>

> > Subject: MAC 10 operating system

> >

> >

> > BD adn MAC users--here is a question?

> >

> > A few scientists who love Mac computers have talked about  the virtues

> of

> > the new MAC operating system 10. They say it is great and it is

> compatible

> > with older Mac operating systems. It even runs Cricket Graph which is 10

> > years old and was susosedly a favorite with the Mac lovers. Has anyone

> > tried to run the BD Cell Quest software with this new operating

> system.Does

> > It work???

> > It would be useful to know prior to installing this great operating

> system

> > on our MAC computers. Thanks

> > Bob

> >

> > Robert M. Zucker, PhD

> > U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

> > MD 72

> > National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory

> > Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711

> > Tel: 919-541-1585; fax 919-541-4017

> > e-mail: zucker.robert@epa.gov

> >

________________________________________

• Next message: Julie Auger: "April 20 workshop in DC"

• Previous message: cabrera.ej@pg.com: "Canine ELISAs"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:16 EST

CellQuest and OS 9.1

From: David_Matsuyama@BDIS.Com

Date: Mon Jun 04 2001 - 10:32:02 EST

• Next message: Beverly E. Barton: "OT: current e-mail address for R. Nunez?"

• Previous message: Haywood Pyle: "NY-ESO"

• Next in thread: duperray@montp.inserm.fr: "Re: CellQuest and OS 9.1"

• Reply: duperray@montp.inserm.fr: "Re: CellQuest and OS 9.1"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

I would like to respond to recent messages posted on the incompatibility of

Apple OS 9.1 and CellQuest Pro and CellQuest.  Apple

?s OS 9.1 requires new BD

inits (v3.4.1). The previous version of BD Inits (v 3.4) is compatible with

operating systems 9.0 and older. BD inits v3.4.1 is compatible with OS 9.0,

9.0.4 and 9.1.   Apple computers obtained outside of BD are not FACStations and

sometimes require customized configurations.  BD warrants all products purchased

from BD.  Inquires concerning obtaining the new BD inits should be directed to

your instrument sales representative.

David Matsuyama

BD Biosciences

Immunocytometry Systems

________________________________________

• Next message: Beverly E. Barton: "OT: current e-mail address for R. Nunez?"

• Previous message: Haywood Pyle: "NY-ESO"

• Next in thread: duperray@montp.inserm.fr: "Re: CellQuest and OS 9.1"

• Reply: duperray@montp.inserm.fr: "Re: CellQuest and OS 9.1"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:21 EST

FlowJo

From: Manfra, Denise (denise.manfra@spcorp.com)

Date: Tue Jun 19 2001 - 09:37:46 EST

• Next message: Arnold Richard Pizzey: "Re: absolute cell counts using FACS"

• Previous message: Sue DeMaggio: "Re: power meter"

• Next in thread: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe reply: CJett: "RE: FlowJo"

• Reply: Maciej Simm: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: janet dow: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe reply: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: FlowJo"

• Reply: Carmen Raventos-Suarez: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe reply: Phil Marder: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Hi:

I wanted some feedback on the FLOW Jo application. I

currently do all of my analysis with CellQuest. I am wondering if FLOW Jo

may expedite my analysis. However, I do not use the same markers all the

time, and in one experiment I may be running more than one stain with

multiple different antibodies. Basically, very seldom do I run the same set

of markers. How does FLOW Jo work for such conditions?? How about plot

analysis and excel: apparently Excell FLOW Jo puts the data directly into

EXcell?? What has been your experience with FLOW Jo?? Any information would

be useful.

denise

***************************************************************

This message and any attachments is solely for the intended recipient. If

you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use, or

distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited --

please immediately and permanently delete this message.

________________________________________

• Next message: Arnold Richard Pizzey: "Re: absolute cell counts using FACS"

• Previous message: Sue DeMaggio: "Re: power meter"

• Next in thread: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe reply: CJett: "RE: FlowJo"

• Reply: Maciej Simm: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: janet dow: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe reply: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: FlowJo"

• Reply: Carmen Raventos-Suarez: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe reply: Phil Marder: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: Adrian Smith (A.Smith@centenary.usyd.edu.AU)

Date: Wed Jun 20 2001 - 01:25:04 EST

• Next message: Esa-Matti Lilius: "review of a thesis"

• Previous message: Martha Moreno-Lafont: "IFN-g detection"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Giovanna Borsellino: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: Giovanna Borsellino: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

> Hi:

>

> I wanted some feedback on the FLOW Jo application. I

>currently do all of my analysis with CellQuest. I am wondering if FLOW Jo

>may expedite my analysis. However, I do not use the same markers all the

>time, and in one experiment I may be running more than one stain with

>multiple different antibodies. Basically, very seldom do I run the same set

>of markers. How does FLOW Jo work for such conditions?? How about plot

>analysis and excel: apparently Excell FLOW Jo puts the data directly into

>EXcell?? What has been your experience with FLOW Jo?? Any information would

>be useful.

>

> denise

I have been using FlowJo since it was released in 1997. I haven't

used CellQuest since I started using FlowJo.

I have analysed thousands of samples with a lot of different stain

combinations and FlowJo has worked very well for this. In FlowJo you

handle multiple stain combinations by grouping all the samples with

the same stain and then applying an analysis to all the samples (and

you can also make sample-specific adjustments very easily).

FlowJo can export statistics for each group and then you simply open

them in Excel. This features has saved me a LOT of time.

I would highly recommend FlowJo. I could go on about its benefits but

you can search the archives for my previous posts on FlowJo or read

the review I wrote at

<http://www.biocompare.com/prorev.asp?profrevid=49> for more of my

opinions. Better still, download the latest version and ask for a

free trial serial number. Make sure you do the tutorial and then test

it out on your own samples.

If you have any specific questions after you have tried it out feel

free to ask.

Adrian Smith

________________________________________

• Next message: Esa-Matti Lilius: "review of a thesis"

• Previous message: Martha Moreno-Lafont: "IFN-g detection"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Giovanna Borsellino: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: Giovanna Borsellino: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: Giovanna Borsellino (gborsel@tin.it)

Date: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 04:26:47 EST

• Next message: Howard Shapiro: "Re: Fluorescence polarization"

• Previous message: Mark Kukuruga: "Re: Do PI concentrations vary for measuring cell viability and DNA analysis???"

• In reply to: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Hi Denise,

        I very highly recommend FlowJo!  In our lab we perform

polychromatic flow cytometry routinely: our samples can be stained with up

to 9 different fluorochromes, and we have multiple samples with different

markers which have to be analyzed in each experiment. We have tried several

software packages, and when we found FlowJo we stopped searching. Actually,

now we use FlowJo even for samples stained with 'only'  3 colours, which we

acquire on the FACScan.

The way FlowJo works is slightly different from other flow-cytometry data

analysis software: basically in FlowJo you create "workspaces" where you

store all the information concerning your experiment: samples, gates,

annotations, statistics, compensation matrices, all your graphs, and

anything else you need for your data analysis. Once you set up the

workspace, data analysis is very fast. A workspace can actually be used as

a 'template'  for batch analysis of any subsequent experiment (this makes

life so much easier!!).

        The data with any statistic you can possibly wish for can be

transferred to Excel with a few clicks of the mouse: basically you choose

the statistics you're interested in, and FlowJo will create a spreadsheet

for you with all the calculated statistics from the samples you have

selected. The spreadsheet can then be easily exported to Excel or to

another application.

        If you are staining with multiple markers, FlowJo will perform

compensation correctly, no matter what the number of your fluorochromes is

(it is virtually impossible to set compensation correctly with the

'eye-meter'  when your samples have been stained for multiple markers).

        The one and only  criticism is that you need a Mac to run it. But

after starting to use it we decided it was actually worth to buy a new Mac,

which is now devoted only to data analysis with FlowJo (so we don't have to

fight over the Mac connected to the FACS...).

        It doesn't take too long to learn - of course, you have to make a

time investment, but it will really pay off. The Help files are helpful

indeed - it took us a couple of days, and that was it. You can try it for a

couple of months by downloading the software and getting a free serial

number. Go for it.

        I will be glad to show you some of the data we have produced

(FlowJo even creates movies!!) if you are interested.

Good luck!

Giovanna

(a FlowJo enthusiast)

>>         Hi:

>>

>>                 I wanted some feedback on the FLOW Jo application. I

>>currently do all of my analysis with CellQuest. I am wondering if FLOW Jo

>>may expedite my analysis. However, I do not use the same markers all the

>>time, and in one experiment I may be running more than one stain with

>>multiple different antibodies. Basically, very seldom do I run the same set

>>of markers. How does FLOW Jo work for such conditions?? How about plot

>>analysis and excel: apparently Excell FLOW Jo puts the data directly into

>>EXcell?? What has been your experience with FLOW Jo?? Any information would

>>be useful.

>>

>>         denise

------------------------------------------------

Giovanna Borsellino, M.D., Ph.D.

Neuroimmunology

IRCCS Santa Lucia

Via Ardeatina 354

00179 Roma

Italy

Tel. ++39.06.51501521 (office)

       ++39.06.51501552 (lab)

Fax  ++39.06.51501553

e-mail: g.borsellino@hsantalucia.it

           gborsel@tin.it

________________________________________

• Next message: Howard Shapiro: "Re: Fluorescence polarization"

• Previous message: Mark Kukuruga: "Re: Do PI concentrations vary for measuring cell viability and DNA analysis???"

• In reply to: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Reply: Adrian Smith: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: janet dow (jldow@unity.ncsu.edu)

Date: Wed Jun 20 2001 - 11:27:00 EST

• Next message: Richard Konz: "Boston Users Group for Cytometry Mailing List"

• Previous message: Simon Monard: "Re: power meter"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

I have recently started using flowjo and i love it.  You can go to their

web site, www.flowjo.com and you can get a free 60 day trial on the

software.  I totally recomment trying it.

Janet Dow

At 10:37 AM -0400 6/19/01, Manfra, Denise wrote:

> Hi:

>

> I wanted some feedback on the FLOW Jo application. I

>currently do all of my analysis with CellQuest. I am wondering if FLOW Jo

>may expedite my analysis. However, I do not use the same markers all the

>time, and in one experiment I may be running more than one stain with

>multiple different antibodies. Basically, very seldom do I run the same set

>of markers. How does FLOW Jo work for such conditions?? How about plot

>analysis and excel: apparently Excell FLOW Jo puts the data directly into

>EXcell?? What has been your experience with FLOW Jo?? Any information would

>be useful.

>

> denise

>

>***************************************************************

> This message and any attachments is solely for the intended recipient. If

>you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use, or

>distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited --

>please immediately and permanently delete this message.

Janet Dow

Research Technician and Manager

Flow Cytometry Facility

North Carolina State College of Veterinary Medicine

Room C-314

Raleigh, NC 27606

(919)513-6364

________________________________________

• Next message: Richard Konz: "Boston Users Group for Cytometry Mailing List"

• Previous message: Simon Monard: "Re: power meter"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: Maciej Simm (simmmmer@yahoo.com)

Date: Wed Jun 20 2001 - 17:01:17 EST

• Next message: Simon Monard: "Re: power meter"

• Previous message: Howard Shapiro: "Re: power meter"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: janet dow: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Denise,

Analysis in FlowJo  works faster than other programs with correct

setup and the right template.

Regardless of how many markers you use, FlowJo will automatically

detect your panel settings and you can isolate/sort FACS files based

on their staining protocol (or any keyword) for a separate analysis.

Once you analyse some files you can generate statistical tables which

can be copied to clipboard and/or opened in excel.

For example, if I have an analyzed set of 1,000 samples for oxidative

burst test and want to generate an excel spreadsheet of

name/date/geometric mean/%positive and CV, I would specify those

parameters in my table editor, and with 2 click of a mouse I'll be in

excel ready to print the results.

FlowJo is also a great database tool for FACS files - one application

of that is to find normal ranges of rarely used markers. add a years

worth of FCS filies (provided enough RAM), create a group based on

your marker, apply gates to all of them with one click, and .. voila.

Plots can also be copied/pasted (as well as exported)  into

Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Canvas etc.

Feel free to contact me if you have any other questions,

Maciej Simm

Tree Star, Inc.

__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail

http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

________________________________________

• Next message: Simon Monard: "Re: power meter"

• Previous message: Howard Shapiro: "Re: power meter"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: janet dow: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

RE: FlowJo

From: CJett (CJett@Compucyte.com)

Date: Wed Jun 20 2001 - 15:25:00 EST

• Next message: Leonid Volkov: "Re: Fluorescence polarization"

• Previous message: Sue DeMaggio: "Core organization and fees"

• Maybe in reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Maciej Simm: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Most hardely agree with Adrian Smith...Flow Jo is a time saver for SO many

parts of data analysis.  It does take some time to get used to if you've

been working in the Cellquest reality for long..but well worth it!  Just not

having to enter data by hand is reason enuff!  But I do suggest keeping CQ

around...graphically it is a lil simpler to cut and paste from

Cj Jett

Scientist: Biomedical Development

Compucyte Corp.

(617)-577-3811

12 Emily St.

Cambridge Ma 02139-4507

________________________________________

• Next message: Leonid Volkov: "Re: Fluorescence polarization"

• Previous message: Sue DeMaggio: "Core organization and fees"

• Maybe in reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Maciej Simm: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: Phil Marder (mr_redram@hotmail.com)

Date: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 14:39:16 EST

• Next message: Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.: "RE: Fluorescence polarization"

• Previous message: Carmen Raventos-Suarez: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe in reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

When is the PC version of FloJo coming?

Some of us are waiting for this to give it a try.

-Phil Marder

----Original Message Follows----

From: Maciej Simm <simmmmer@yahoo.com>

To: cyto-inbox

Subject: Re: FlowJo

Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:01:17 -0700 (PDT)

Denise,

Analysis in FlowJo  works faster than other programs with correct

setup and the right template.

Regardless of how many markers you use, FlowJo will automatically

detect your panel settings and you can isolate/sort FACS files based

on their staining protocol (or any keyword) for a separate analysis.

Once you analyse some files you can generate statistical tables which

can be copied to clipboard and/or opened in excel.

For example, if I have an analyzed set of 1,000 samples for oxidative

burst test and want to generate an excel spreadsheet of

name/date/geometric mean/%positive and CV, I would specify those

parameters in my table editor, and with 2 click of a mouse I'll be in

excel ready to print the results.

FlowJo is also a great database tool for FACS files - one application

of that is to find normal ranges of rarely used markers. add a years

worth of FCS filies (provided enough RAM), create a group based on

your marker, apply gates to all of them with one click, and .. voila.

Plots can also be copied/pasted (as well as exported)  into

Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Canvas etc.

Feel free to contact me if you have any other questions,

Maciej Simm

Tree Star, Inc.

__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail

http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

_________________________________________________________________

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

________________________________________

• Next message: Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.: "RE: Fluorescence polarization"

• Previous message: Carmen Raventos-Suarez: "Re: FlowJo"

• Maybe in reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: Adrian Smith (A.Smith@centenary.usyd.edu.AU)

Date: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 16:44:49 EST

• Next message: Larry Arnold: "Fwd: Re: power meter"

• Previous message: Thomas Ahern: "Epithelial Markers"

• In reply to: Giovanna Borsellino: "Re: FlowJo"

• Next in thread: CJett: "RE: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

At 10:26 AM +0100 21/6/2001, Giovanna Borsellino wrote:

>

>         The one and only  criticism is that you need a Mac to run it.

>

Some people would say that is a definite advantage :)

At 4:25 PM -0400 20/6/2001, CJett wrote:

>  But I do suggest keeping CQ

>around...graphically it is a lil simpler to cut and paste from

But plots looks SO much nicer when they come from FlowJo...

Adrian Smith

________________________________________

• Next message: Larry Arnold: "Fwd: Re: power meter"

• Previous message: Thomas Ahern: "Epithelial Markers"

• In reply to: Giovanna Borsellino: "Re: FlowJo"

• Next in thread: CJett: "RE: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo

From: Carmen Raventos-Suarez (carmen.raventossuarez@bms.com)

Date: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 16:49:26 EST

• Next message: Phil Marder: "Re: FlowJo"

• Previous message: Emmanuel Gustin: "Re: power meter"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Phil Marder: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Denise and everybody else interested in Flow Jo:

I have been using Flow Jo for a year and my requirements are very much like

yours. I also do a lot of DNA analysis, apoptosis and proliferation assays.

We just use the Fl-1,  Fl-2,  etc. as defaults. That way we can run different

set of samples using several different markers with the same dye at a single

run. Later in the analysis we add to the plots the specific name of the

markers. It is fast and efficient, I definitely love it, my analysis time has

been cut down in an exponential way. You create a template and can drop buckets

of samples in it to be analyzed in no time. This includes time for you to view

every single plot in a movie sequence to be sure that all your gates are

correct. Still  if you have cells from different origins and need to correct

gates, this can be done for the individual samples that require correction

leaving the rest untouchable. And the results on excel are at your finger tips

customized by your needs in a couple of clicks. I will never forget all the

macros I needed to built to create individual excel tables from cell quest.

I fewer words, as I told BD who where the ones who introduce me to Flow Jo:

"Flow Jo is like to live in the future and there is no way you want to return

to the past".

Carmen

"Manfra, Denise" wrote:

>         Hi:

>

>                 I wanted some feedback on the FLOW Jo application. I

> currently do all of my analysis with CellQuest. I am wondering if FLOW Jo

> may expedite my analysis. However, I do not use the same markers all the

> time, and in one experiment I may be running more than one stain with

> multiple different antibodies. Basically, very seldom do I run the same set

> of markers. How does FLOW Jo work for such conditions?? How about plot

> analysis and excel: apparently Excell FLOW Jo puts the data directly into

> EXcell?? What has been your experience with FLOW Jo?? Any information would

> be useful.

>

>         denise

>

> ***************************************************************

>  This message and any attachments is solely for the intended recipient. If

> you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use, or

> distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited --

> please immediately and permanently delete this message.

________________________________________

• text/x-vcard attachment: Card for Carmen Raventos-Suarez

________________________________________

• Next message: Phil Marder: "Re: FlowJo"

• Previous message: Emmanuel Gustin: "Re: power meter"

• In reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Phil Marder: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

RE: FlowJo

From: Gerstein, Rachel (Rachel.Gerstein@umassmed.edu)

Date: Fri Jun 22 2001 - 09:39:24 EST

• Next message: Emmanuel Gustin: "Re: power meter"

• Previous message: Larry Arnold: "Fwd: Re: power meter"

• Maybe in reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Carmen Raventos-Suarez: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

I think FlowJo will still expedite your analysis, because its quick to call

up new 2-D plots and impose new gates.  And the quick dump into Excell, or

using FlowJo's own table generator will also save time.  I use FlowJo

exclusively and highly recommend it.  Its worth mentioning that its easy to

learn and I rountinely teach undergraduates to do their own analyses.

Good luck,

Rachel

=======================================================

Rachel M. Gerstein, Ph.D.

Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology

Graduate Program in Immunology/Virology

University of Massachusetts Medical School

55 Lake Avenue North

Worcester, MA 01655-0002

(508) 856-1044

(508) 856-5920 (FAX)

> ----------

> From: Manfra, Denise

> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:37 AM

> To: Cytometry Mailing List

> Subject: FlowJo

>

>

>

> Hi:

>

> I wanted some feedback on the FLOW Jo application. I

> currently do all of my analysis with CellQuest. I am wondering if FLOW Jo

> may expedite my analysis. However, I do not use the same markers all the

> time, and in one experiment I may be running more than one stain with

> multiple different antibodies. Basically, very seldom do I run the same

> set

> of markers. How does FLOW Jo work for such conditions?? How about plot

> analysis and excel: apparently Excell FLOW Jo puts the data directly into

> EXcell?? What has been your experience with FLOW Jo?? Any information

> would

> be useful.

>

> denise

>

> ***************************************************************

>  This message and any attachments is solely for the intended recipient. If

> you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use, or

> distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited --

> please immediately and permanently delete this message.

>

>

________________________________________

• Next message: Emmanuel Gustin: "Re: power meter"

• Previous message: Larry Arnold: "Fwd: Re: power meter"

• Maybe in reply to: Manfra, Denise: "FlowJo"

• Next in thread: Carmen Raventos-Suarez: "Re: FlowJo"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

[Fwd: [Fwd: Converting data from Mac]]

From: Ana Salas (ana@lupo.medicina.uniovi.es)

Date: Tue Jul 17 2001 - 07:31:49 EST

• Next message: Jeff Louie: "7 AAD"

• Previous message: Fjerdingstad, Hege: "RE: aVb3 and aVb5 monoclonal antibodies"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

attached mail follows:

________________________________________

Hola Ana.

Tal vez esto llegue un poco tarde pero el 13 ya estaba de vacances.

> Subject: Converting data from Mac

> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:10:00 +0200

> From: Ellen.Freed@astrazeneca.com

> To: Cytometry Mailing List <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>

>

> Hi All

>

> We're considering buying a FACScalibur from BD, but are concerned that BD is

> all in MAC format and all our computers are PC's .  I was told by someone at

> BD that this shouldn't be a problem, because everything could be easily

> converted if need be - but I've heard of others who've had problems with this.

>

> I have been working with a FACScalibur conected to a Mac. The data files

> generated by this system are compatible with other flowcytometer PC's

> software, including cell cycle analysis. There was no need for data

> conversion. The only difference is that data files generated by PC have an

> extension .fcs and the ones the generated under Mac have no extension or

> something like .001 that is not a real file extension. However, files

> generated under Mac with a file name as RQ.001 are directly read by Modfit

> under PC.

>

> We'll need to do cell cycle analysis using Modfit or Multicycle, which we'll

> probably want to have on a couple of remote computers which are PC's.  Any

> experience with this problem?

I have carried cell cycle analysis using Modfit both in Mac and PC's versions.

>

> Also, I know that CellQuest is also only in MAC format.  What does CellQuest

> offer that we couldn't do with the above-mentioned cell cycle programs?

>

Cell Quest is the software that adquires the data directely from the

flowcytometer and where you can adjust the receptor channels (intensity,

compensation, threshold), the data that you want to store in the data files, the

number of cells to analyse, etc.

Modfit carries out the model analysis to determine cell cycle populations from

the files generated by Cell Quest. I have not used Multicycle.

I have been working with a FACScalibur in Bergen (Norway) a few months ago. Data

files were generated by Cell Quest (under Mac). I sent several of those files to

the technician of the University of Oviedo (that works with PC) to carry out the

cell cycle analysis and she couldn�t read them. In the begining, we thought that

it was a matter of Mac-PC compatibility, but turned out to be a problem of data

transference through email, that for some reason the files were somehow altered.

All the data files generated by the FACScalibur that I worked with in Bergen

(conected to a Mac) are read for cell cycle analysis by Modfit under a PC.

>

> Thanks to anyone who can help.

>

> Ellen Freed

> Scientist

> Cancer Bioscience

> AstraZeneca R & D Boston

--

Rafael Gonz�lez-Quir�s

Universidad de Oviedo

Dpt. B.O.S. (�rea Ecolog�a)

c/ Catedr�tico Rodrigo Ur�a s/n

Oviedo 33071

Spain

Tfn: +34-985104831

Fax: +34-985104866

________________________________________

• Next message: Jeff Louie: "7 AAD"

• Previous message: Fjerdingstad, Hege: "RE: aVb3 and aVb5 monoclonal antibodies"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:23 EST

FlowJo plus others

From: Andy Johnson (andy@brc.ubc.ca)

Date: Thu Jun 21 2001 - 13:51:26 EST

• Next message: emorgan@PharMingen.com: "INF-gamma detection"

• Previous message: Lily Lai: "Re: IFN-g detection"

• Next in thread: Bgreig2@AOL.com: "Re: FlowJo plus others"

• Maybe reply: Bgreig2@AOL.com: "Re: FlowJo plus others"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Just a quick point

It all seems to be happening again, with regards to alternative analysis

software.  Whilst everybody is raving about FlowJo you have to remember

that there are quite a number of analysis software packages available.

Although FlowJo is good, I choose to use FCSpress.

All the programs offer much the same features although the cost varies, so

again play around and choose the one that suits you.

Andy

FACS Facility Manager

Biomedical Research Centre

Vancouver

________________________________________

• Next message: emorgan@PharMingen.com: "INF-gamma detection"

• Previous message: Lily Lai: "Re: IFN-g detection"

• Next in thread: Bgreig2@AOL.com: "Re: FlowJo plus others"

• Maybe reply: Bgreig2@AOL.com: "Re: FlowJo plus others"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

Re: FlowJo plus others

From: Bgreig2@AOL.com

Date: Fri Jun 22 2001 - 11:57:31 EST

• Next message: Wilshire Jennifer: "FlowJo Seminars-NIH and Baltimore (6/25-6/28)"

• Previous message: Jan_F_Keij@sbphrd.com: "osmium tetroxide fixation"

• Maybe in reply to: Andy Johnson: "FlowJo plus others"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

I'd have to agree with Andy.  There are several good off-line programs out there.

Verity Software's WINLIST program has countless features that we find invaluable for list

mode analysis including batch analysis, auto-compensation, export/import functionality,

spreadsheet linking, database support...the list of features is extensive.  And,

it's very easy to learn.

 CellQuest is fine for lots of app's but flexability and learning seem to be easier

 with these alternative programs.  As mentioned in an earlier discussion, check around

 and try some demos before jumping in.

My two cents,

Bruce Greig

Immunopathology Lab

Vanderbilt Univ. Medical Center

Nashville, TN.

________________________________________

• Next message: Wilshire Jennifer: "FlowJo Seminars-NIH and Baltimore (6/25-6/28)"

• Previous message: Jan_F_Keij@sbphrd.com: "osmium tetroxide fixation"

• Maybe in reply to: Andy Johnson: "FlowJo plus others"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:22 EST

FlowJo Question

From: Barbara Peters (Barbara_Peters@dfci.harvard.edu)

Date: Tue Jul 17 2001 - 07:34:16 EST

• Next message: Dr. Wolfgang Beisker: "Cells in Milk"

• Previous message: Jeff Louie: "7 AAD"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

I was wondering if anyone that uses FlowJo regularly would know how one would get

statistics or a marker in the layout editor on an overlay plot.  I am aware of how

to create overlays, although I can not get the marker to appear in the histograms.

Thanks for your time and info!

Regards,

Barbara M. Peters

x2-3179

________________________________________

• Next message: Dr. Wolfgang Beisker: "Cells in Milk"

• Previous message: Jeff Louie: "7 AAD"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:23 EST

FlowJo Training Sessions (Southeast US)

From: Adam Treister (ast@treestar.com)

Date: Wed Sep 19 2001 - 00:35:33 EST

• Next message: Richard Haugland: "Re: human cell markers"

• Previous message: Houston, Jim : "RE: human cell markers"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

I will be in Georgia, Alabama and North Carolina, offering FlowJo seminars

and training sessions this week and next week.  All of the hosting sites

have gratiously opened the sessions to members of the Cytometry list, so

please come and learn how to get more out of this powerful software package.

Times and locations are listed below.

I apologize for the last minute notification, but it was only this afternoon

that we finally confirmed the availability of tomorrow's flight.  Clearly

this is a difficult time for us all in light of last week's tragedy, but I

don't know what we can do other than push onward.

Adam Treister

---------------------------

FlowJo Seminars

Thursday Sept 20  10:30 AM

Emory University

Vaccine Research Center

Room 1010

Friday Sept 21  1 PM

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Wallace Tumor Institute 486

Monday Sept 24  9 AM

EPA  Research Triangle Park

US EPA-ERC Building, Classroom 3

(Research Triangle Cytometry Association Meeting)

Tuesday Sept 25 9:30 AM

Duke University

Jones Bldg, Room 143

Wednesday, Sept 26:  11  AM

UNC Chapel Hill

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center  Rm 32001

------------------------------------------------------------------

Adam Treister

Tree Star, Inc.

ph: 800-366-6045 intl: 1-650-591-2854 fax: 1-650-508-9186

adam@treestar.com    www.flowjo.com

------------------------------------------------------------------

________________________________________

• Next message: Richard Haugland: "Re: human cell markers"

• Previous message: Houston, Jim : "RE: human cell markers"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:25 EST

Re: Cell Quest Pro

From: Geoffrey Osborne (geoff.osborne@anu.edu.au)

Date: Fri Jul 27 2001 - 15:08:32 EST

• Next message: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: Dealing with autofluorescence"

• Previous message: Andrea Illingworth: "Flow Cytometry position"

• In reply to: Cliff McArthur: "Cell Quest Pro"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

Hi Cliff,

We've been using CELLQuest(CQ) pro for a couple of months on our BD LSR,

Mac G4 OS9.0 and it has a few differences from CQ, the most important from

our point of view is that it can "drive" an LSR.

A quick summary of other differences are:

a "hilight" feature to enlarge the dot size for events meeting the

selected gate criteria, a useful feature we use a lot;

a snap function for drawing regions (analysis);

functions (addition/ division etc) can be performed on generated stats;

there is a new Browser floating window which essentially replaces the

Acquisition Control floating window which is used in CQ, and really goes

back to what we had in many respects in LYSIS II, with parameter

description items, filename, SAMPLE ID etc controllable from one window.

You can also use the Browser to load different instrument settings to the

instrument for alternating tubes, for example, but it's not something we do

routinely;

the Inspector is a new tool which is plot/window sensitive, and you can

use it to modify plot attributes such as font face, number of dots

displayed, apply gates etc.

There are a few other things but practically it's a short learning curve

from CQ to CQ Pro. Whether the new features are worth the extra dollars is

hard to say, but if you have the finances buy it and see for yourself.

Hope this helps

Geoff

At 02:39 PM 7/25/01 -0600, Cliff McArthur wrote:

>

>Hi All,

>

>You know the drill... sales calls and conversations with sales people

>aside, I'd love to know just what the differences are between Cell Quest

>and Cell Quest Pro.  Furthermore, I'd love to know why I'd hear of a price

>quote of something like $5000 for the latter.

>

>?!?!?!?!?!

>

>I've only recently heard about this Pro version of Cell Quest, and a search

>of the archives yields me little to nothing.

>

>Many thanks,

>Cliff J. McArthur

>The University of California at San Francisco

>Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious disease

>cliff@itsa.ucsf.edu

>415-502-6860

>

>

Geoffrey Osborne

Specialist, Flow Cytometry,

John Curtin School of Medical Research,

The Australian National University,

Canberra, 0200, ACT. AUSTRALIA

email: geoff.osborne@anu.edu.au

http://jcsmr.anu.edu.au/facslab/facshome.html

(61 2) 6125 3694.

________________________________________

• Next message: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: Dealing with autofluorescence"

• Previous message: Andrea Illingworth: "Flow Cytometry position"

• In reply to: Cliff McArthur: "Cell Quest Pro"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

________________________________________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:40:23 EST

December 24, 2008 3:16 PM
 

Alaric said:

Just want to say i`m glad i found this site.

I am from Swaziland and also now teach English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "Com search results - airline tickets."

Thank 8-) Alaric.

April 4, 2009 9:17 AM
 

Azalea said:

Hi. You never know till you try to reach them how accessible men are; but you must approach each man by the right door.

I am from Sri and learning to read in English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "Fare sales airline museum gift shop."

With respect 8-), Azalea.

April 5, 2009 12:03 PM

Leave a Comment

Name  

Comments 
Type the characters you see in the picture on the left.
    



Note: HTML tags in comment messages are not supported.